Join us!If you are interested in using REDCap at your institution, see the Become a Partner page to find more information about joining our group.Technical: If you wish to know more details regarding technical aspects of the REDCap software and best practices for implementing REDCap, you may download the following document: REDCap Technical Overview
Red Giant Software Patch V1 Download
Download File: https://urluso.com/2vKIiY
Like I said - contact Maxon to fix it as they're the ones responsible. I contacted Maxon and they responded,"It's worth noting that we put out a new version of Universe yesterday which may solve your issue. Go ahead and close close your editing software, launch the Maxon App, and click Update to download and install the fix onto your machine."
Think very carefully about defending RedHat here. While RedHat generally get Free Software and are reasonably trust-worthy[1], and we might feel like cutting them slack, there are plenty of other Linux distributors who don't. Particularly in the embedded world, if you can even get (all) the source, it's usually a giant tarball. To the extent such distributors keep patches separated out internally, users who buy such devices *should* be able to get at those patches. It's not a massive issue yet, because usually the changes they make are small enough that diffing is still tractable - but that need not always remain the case.1. Even if they've apparently acquired some amount of middle-management that doesn't and may not be, according to daniel (which, if correct, makes for a long-term worry the community should have for RedHat: some of those middle-managers may progress to top-level management one day). It's not so simple Posted Mar 2, 2011 7:33 UTC (Wed) by dlang (guest, #313) [Link]
I don't care about Red Hat's business, but I do care about GPL compliance, so let's look at that aspect. To those who receive binaries (as part of their subscription), Red Hat also make the corresponding sources available, albeit in a form that others (who additionally have access to that software) may not prefer. In addition, Red Hat also appear to make the patches available on the condition that these are not redistributed, with the penalty for breaking this condition being that the offending subscriber's subscription is terminated and that they will receive no more patches.
Clearly, the GPL doesn't make anyone promise that they will continue to share new updates and revisions to a piece of software that has already been shared, so Red Hat can probably get away with making such continued sharing conditional on the "good behaviour" of subscribers. You can even turn this on its head and say that Red Hat only promises to share one revision's worth of patches but may continue to do so on the basis of such "good behaviour".
2ff7e9595c
Comments